28 Oct 2023 4:02 pm
Sidney Powell was a very highly regarded federal prosecutor within the legal profession until all this blew up. A long successful history in the legal profession.maineman » 27 Oct 2023, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑ I think that the reason Team Kraken never produced their volumes of supposed "evidence" was that none of them were in a hurry to lose their law licenses. And attempting to pawn off "affidavits" that merely recounted people's impressions of what they thought might have been suspicious behavior on the part of poll workers as "evidence of massive voter fraud" would be a violation of their code of ethics. THere was no "evidence" There was no smoking gun. There were no hundreds of thousands of ballots printed in China on rice paper. There wasn't any massive voter fraud. And Team Kraken knew it. That is what I think.
You say 'Supposed evidence'.. Do you honestly think a highly accomplished federal prosecutor doesn't know what evidence is and isn't?. Do you honestly think Dumb Lemon - that brainless, sex predator *** ***, inflatable rubber news-johnny, has a better idea of what evidence is and isn't, than a highly accomplished federal prosecutor does?
Or alternatively, do you think Sidney Powell randomly lost her mind and just started spouting anything that came in to her head?
Alternatively, do you think, she was so enamoured with Donald Trump, that she happily flushed her hard-earned reputation down the toilet... to win what exactly??
What sounds credible to you amongst this series of idiot explanations? Let me help you out here.. none of them
No, I'm not raking through history to 'provide links'. If you can't directly dispute a point, then question your own links.